3
edits
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Pitto :3|Pitto :3]] 15:08, 22 August 2012 (MDT) | [[User:Pitto :3|Pitto :3]] 15:08, 22 August 2012 (MDT) | ||
:I disagree; it is a valid description that accurately reflects the danger this enemy possesses to players. That being said, it might be a good idea to change the tone somewhat, but there's no need to remove it outright.--[[User:Anothrgamer1234|Anothrgamer1234]] 17:18, 22 August 2012 (MDT) | :I disagree; it is a valid description that accurately reflects the danger this enemy possesses to players. That being said, it might be a good idea to change the tone somewhat, but there's no need to remove it outright.--[[User:Anothrgamer1234|Anothrgamer1234]] 17:18, 22 August 2012 (MDT) | ||
This whole article looks like it needs to be rewritten in a tone that is more informative and...well, neutral, instead of the largely opinionated tome it is in now. |
edits