Anonymous

User talk:IceBlue: Difference between revisions

From Icaruspedia, the high flying Kid Icarus Wiki
Line 63: Line 63:
[[User:JORDAN DEBONO|JORDAN DEBONO]] 12:47, 17 July 2012 (MDT)
[[User:JORDAN DEBONO|JORDAN DEBONO]] 12:47, 17 July 2012 (MDT)
:But at least it still has content. [[User:IceBlue|<font style="color:skyblue">'''Ice'''</font>]][[User talk:IceBlue|<font style="color:royalblue">'''Blue'''</font>]][[Special:Editcount/IceBlue|<font style="color:hotpink"><sup>[E]</sup></font>]] 19:40, 17 July 2012 (MDT)
:But at least it still has content. [[User:IceBlue|<font style="color:skyblue">'''Ice'''</font>]][[User talk:IceBlue|<font style="color:royalblue">'''Blue'''</font>]][[Special:Editcount/IceBlue|<font style="color:hotpink"><sup>[E]</sup></font>]] 19:40, 17 July 2012 (MDT)
So going by your very brief defense, so long as this wiki has content, regardless if it's relevant or irrelevant, it's good enough to keep. The reason why I joined '''Icaruspedia''' and not the '''Kid Icarus Wikia''' was because that wiki is intent on getting as much (useless) info as possible. They're interested in the article count, not correct info and content. Since I value my membership here more over this petty argument, I will not continue quarreling. Although I will be condensing the description to a two-liner. As for the Windy Wasteland layout of titles, I still oppose your method but will not pursue it as it's not worth it. Happy Editing,
[[User:JORDAN DEBONO|JORDAN DEBONO]] 00:51, 18 July 2012 (MDT)
805

edits